Remember When Bush Promised Unity In 2000? Dems Weren’t Interested. Why Is That?

Remember When Bush Promised Unity? Dems Weren’t Interested. Why Is That?

Why didn’t the Dems seek unity also in 2000? Because they believed that 537 votes were ‘off’ in the 2000 election. That’s why. Of course, they had a media on their ‘side’, as they always do. Not so much the Republican, Trump people this time around. The 73 or so million Trump supporters can go to hell as far as the Dems are concerned. None of the news media is even showing what is happening with voter fraud this year. I just sit here and shake my head. But, then I remember the “Communist goals for America”, entered into congress in 1963 by Judge Herlong & I face reality all over again: The Communist, Radical Leftist goals are complete: They have performed an election coup and now they plan to rule–with an iron fist, no doubt.

Blast from the past:

I think Bush was a very bad President. He literally gave us Obama who turned out to be a worse war monger than Bush. But, you’d never know that because the main stream didn’t cover it. Why should they? It would make their King Obama look bad. They only do that sh*t to Republicans.


In this video below, this young man gets booted out. 

 (I usually dont like writing about this kind of thing, preferring “then and nows” and my own opinions..)

 But come ON, this is just not being reported

Click: ClimateGate links  Tip/Public Secrets WordPress.

It may be a holiday here in the US, but the news and revelations about the scandal that may sink the Cult of Anthropogenic Global Warming didn’t take the weekend off. Here are some of the more interesting links to cross the Public Secrets case desk:

There’s never just one:

The biggest item, and the one that has to have cultists and alarmists worldwide burning candles to Al Gore, is news that the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit may not be the only site to have manipulated data to fit a preferred result. New Zealand’s National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) has been accused of manipulating data to show a warming trend where none existed. Lawrence Solomon of Canada’s Financial Post reveals a connection from NIWA back to the corruption-tainted CRU, while James Delingpole comments on the deepening shame.


Hundreds of highly compromising emails and documents have been leaked online from the Climatic Research Unit University of East Anglia. The leak calls into question scientific methods and the results of several public climate research institutes. The CRU is one of the world’s leading research centers on climate change and the top source of temperature data worldwide. It played a key role in the IPCC’s fourth Assessment Report, which is the scientific base of policy negotiations at the Copenhagen Climate Conference next month. The IPCC fourth Assessment Report provides support for policy to mitigate global warming and for a further implementation of the Kyoto Protocol. Proposals for a new Copenhagen Climate Treaty including new regulations and the much disputed Global Emissions Trading scheme costing taxpayers trillions of dollars worldwide were based on the IPCC’s claimed research results.  The rest, here:
A list of excerpts from the incriminating emails can be found at Bishop Hill’s website