Iraq–We Warned You

IRAQ—WE WARNED YOU

After 9/11, President Bush had many options in Afghanistan and chose the worst option out of all of his choices.  The Jewish Task Force (JTF) was screaming from our little TV studio that Neutron Bombs should be employed in the hills of Tora Bora. The radiation would have sealed Bin Laden’s fate, but instead he fled over the border to Pakistan, due to our weak response, which ended up killing and maiming many American soldiers.

While the police action was going on in Afghanistan, the president looked around for other problem areas to strike out at. Iraq seemed like a possible choice thinking people would see that having Iraq and Afghanistan under our military control, would have the crazies in Iran surrounded. That wasn’t the reason at all. President Bush saw Iraq as a safe haven for terrorists and while true, they were not Al qaeda terrorists. Using the excuse that Saddam Hussein had WMD and an active WMD program, we sold the idea to the rest of the world that Iraq was the next ‘best place’ to hit.  After all, Saddam surely acted like he was building WMD of all types, and he did have 500-550 tons of Yellow Cake, known to the west in the Gulf War of 1991 which were all moved to Canada in June, 2008.

The BIG problem here is that Saddam Hussein/Iraq were definite blusterers and you might say pains in the ass, but he was no real threat to anyone. More than that, he was a check on the nuts in Iran, who were deathly afraid of him, because of the almost 2 million lives lost on both sides in the Iraq/Iran war of the 1980s. We removed that check which let Iran concentrate on their military buildup and their years upon years of trying to obtain nuclear weapons.

On our weekly TV shows we not only warned over and over that Iraq was a mistake, that Saddam Hussein was no threat but also had Islamic expert, Craig Winn, on as a guest who confirmed what we said, that if we stay there for 100 years, a Shiite/Sunni civil war will break out almost as soon as we leave.  Now, its worse than that, with an insane Sunni terrorist group, who learned their trade from Al qaeda, attacking, killing and mutilating Shiites, bringing of all states, Iran into the fight. This could end up really bad with a Muslim terrorist state in the heart of that insane part of the globe.

Like us or not, all regular viewers of the JTF TV shows remember that every prediction we made over the years, came to fruition and unfortunately so did this one.   None of this would be happening had Saddam Hussein, a brutal butcher in his own right, remained in power.

How many Americans were lost or injured for life, how much treasure was spent on the so called war in Iraq just to make things far worse than they already were?

David Ben Moshe

SO? Statue Of Saddam Hussein Came Down, Were Is Iraq Today? (Statues Of Lenin Fall In #Ukraine)

SO? Statue Of Saddam Hussein Came Down, Were Is Iraq Today? (Statues Of Lenin Fall In Ukraine)

People are making a big deal out of some statues coming down in Ukraine.  Big deal, some statues of Lenin came down.  Its not the statues of Lenin that were the issue and problem, it is the IDEOLOGY that is evil.  Statues also came down in Iraq, and how do the Iraqi’s live now??  How will the Ukrainians live? And, what fascist will we install to turn their lives upside down?

Ukraine, today (Statue of Lenin)

www.forbes.com

Iraq, 2003 (Statue of Saddam Hussein)

www.theguardian.com

How do the Iraqi’s live now? Iraq violence: Almost 50 killed in car bomb wave Feb 18, 2014
Iraq: Jihadists murder at least 15 people with bombs … – Dec 2013

Jihad in Iraq: 66 people killed & over 120 wounded … November 2013

ETC.

Emotions destroy logic and reason.

My husband has a friend that lives in Iraq and travels back and forth.  He says Iraq is a disaster zone, very unsafe since America invaded.

DICTATOR-Obama Releases More Illegal Occupiers Into Streets. He’s An Illegal, Himself

 

The defacto dictator, Barack has released a few thousand more slimey wetbacks into our streets to murder, rape and rob stupid Americans.  While he is doing this, he says he is ‘not a dictator’. I say BULLSHIT.  Just like Barack Obama, Nicolae Ceausescu, Saddam Hussein, and Fidel Castro also released criminal prisoners. 

So, there it is.  Barack does the same thing; Punishes political ‘enemies’.  Excuse me, he IS the enemy.   He is a Commu-NAZI, fascist, piece of excrement. Period.  If the illegals come near us, its simple; They will be dead illegals.  You dumb lefty’s can kiss illegal ass. Fine.  We will execute them up here.  “Liberals” try to be ‘tolerant’.   Sure, tolerance for illegal criminals, NO tolerance for Americans.  What a crock of shit ‘Liberals’ are.  I just wish the illegals would go straight into the left-wingers homes and do whatever… CHANGE!

I thought the bitch, Napolitano said she didn’t do this after the WH blamed her: ‘Homeland’ released over 2,000 immigrants… MORE…

AND, you all think cases of TB just ‘happened’ in LA?  Ha Ha Ha, dummies.. NOPE.  TB is from the 3rd world.  From the illegal, occupying, criminal invaders…

Good, the TB is in LA.  GREAT!! DIE LIBERALS, DIE!

Dangerous TB Patient Nabbed on Border…

 

Fascism\totalitarianism in America will come from the Left with great fanfare by their media wing in the MSM because there are simply no limits on what a Democrat\Leftist can do. 

Prime example:

Republican President Bush
Interrogation of terrrorist was the “worst human rights violation” since the Inquisition.

Democrat President Obama:
Drone attacks against American citizens and outright killing of said terrorists …..meh, not a big deal at all even when Nancy Pelosi, the lead Congressional Democrat, said that the President had no obligation to tell the American people about it or to justify why it was being done….or when the newest appointees to the post of Secretary of Defense\National Security would not assure\guarantee that they would not be used within the boundaries of USA.

Didn’t even cause a stir in the MSM of NBC, ABC, CBS or CNN…not a peep as they were too busy during the period launching a preemptive attack on a potential Republican presidential candidate because he took a sip of water during a speech. Even though I dont like Rubio, that’s what they did…

Take Note: What vital US interest dictates the risk of American lives and money in Syria?

Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, the Ranking Republican on Senate Foreign Affairs, who had fought determinedly against the Kerry-Obama Libyan slaughter last year, asked at today’s hearing whether it is now U.S. policy to call for the ouster of every authoritarian national leader who encounters opposition from within his own people, as we did with Saddam Hussein, Muammar Qaddafi, Hosni Mubarak and now Bashar Assad. He said that this policy brought us a ten-year war in Iraq, and that the American people want nothing more to do with such a policy. What vital US interest dictates the risk of American lives and money in Syria?

Take note of: What vital US interest dictates the risk of American lives and money in Syria?
That Innocent Syrians who are being Murdered at Will does not impact the Stone Intellect Lugar. American lives. American money is of prime importance. The rest of the world can suffer , die, and enslaved by America for all the filth cares.

Kerry defended the policy of Invade, Murder, Plunder showing a poll taken by the Holocaust Center, among other polls, shows that if the public is convinced that horrendous massacres are taking place, and ethnic cleansing with use of weapons of mass destruction, they will turn around and support a war on Syria. ENGINEERED BY SATAN USA IN COLLABORATION WITH THE ARAB GCC AND THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD.
BUT , The Dumb as Rocks Americans will fall for the LIES, as usual.

Witness Ambassador James Dobbins added that, although a Syria war is unpopular, polls show that an Iran war is widely supported. Therefore, the public must be convinced that military intervention in Syria is a cleverer way to defeat Iran.

Now, tell us Amerikaners, that evil does not reside in the Rotten Hearts of America.

-QV

WHAT THE DEMOCRATS REALLY SAID ABOUT THE WMDS

What Democrats said about Weapons of Mass Destruction

Amazingly, there are still liberals and democrats repeating the “Bush lied about WMDs” mantra. Let’s put it to rest once and for all. Before we went to war in Iraq, what did DEMOCRATS say about the connection between Saddam and WMDs?


“One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.”
– President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
– President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

“We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.”
– Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998

“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
– Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

“[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.”
Letter to President Clinton.
– (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998

“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
– Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

“Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”
– Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them.”
– Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
– Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
– Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”
– Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…”
– Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

“I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”
– Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years … We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”
– Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members … It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
– Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.”
– Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

“Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real…”
– Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003